⚖️ LegalTechOn Time📋 Fixed Price

LegalTech Court Bundle Digital Platform — UK Litigation Support

UK6 min readUpdated September 2025
Region
UK
Contract
Fixed Price
Tech Stack
7 Technologies
IP
100% transferred

Project Overview

A UK top-20 litigation law firm with 240 fee earners, 180 ongoing matters with court bundles, and significant ...

Technology Stack

ReactNode.js/FastifyPostgreSQLiManage Work 10 APINetDocuments APIpdflib (PDF/A generation)AWS eu-west-2

Compliance & Standards

HMCTS Practice Direction 51OSRA Code of ConductUK GDPRLegal Professional Privilege protectionCyber Essentials
Step 01

The Challenge

A UK top-20 litigation law firm with 240 fee earners, 180 ongoing matters with court bundles, and significant manual bundle preparation cost (estimated £1.8M per year in fee earner time) wanted a digital court bundle platform — replacing PDF compilation, index creation, and pagination with an automated process. HMCTS e-bundle requirements (Practice Direction 51O — Electronic Working), SRA professional obligations, UK GDPR for litigation party data, and Legal Professional Privilege protection were the requirements. Budget: £80,000.

Step 02

Our Approach

Bundle Compliance

  • Practice Direction 51O (Electronic Working Pilot — extended to permanent programme): court bundles submitted electronically.
  • E-bundle format requirements: PDF/A compliance (archival format), hyperlinked index (each index entry linked to document page), page numbers continuous throughout (not per document), and document metadata (title, date, page range).

ClickMasters automated bundle generation

upload documents → automatic PDF/A conversion → pagination → hyperlinked index generation → PD 51O compliance check before submission.

Bundle assembly workflow

fee earner selects documents from matter DMS (iManage or NetDocuments API) → bundles them into sections (Pleadings, Witness Statements, Exhibits, Expert Reports, Authorities) → automatic index generated (document title, date, tab number, page range).

Index hyperlinks

PDF internal links — each index entry clicks to the first page of that document.

Bundle pagination

continuous numbering (A/1, A/2... through all sections) or section-based (1-001, 1-002...) — configurable per court requirements.

LPP documents

many documents in litigation files carry LPP.

Bundle platform

every document tagged as LPP or non-privileged at upload.

Bundle generation

LPP tag check — LPP documents not included in opponent-facing bundles unless waived.

Privilege log

automated privilege log generated (document title, date, privilege type, holder, reason for privilege claim) — required in some disclosure regimes.

Access control

opponent counsel bundle (shared version) vs full bundle (firm only) — different access levels enforced at the document record level.

Matter Integration and DMS Connection

i

Manage Work 10 API

matter workspace access (documents, folders, metadata), document retrieval (PDF, DOCX, XLSX), and version history.

NetDocuments API

equivalent integration for firms using NetDocuments.

Document classification

ClickMasters NLP classifier assigns document type on upload (Pleading, Witness Statement, Exhibit, Expert Report, Correspondence — 94% accuracy).

Matter timeline

court order dates and hearing dates from matter DMS — automatically generate "documents to be filed by [date]" workflow.

Step 03

The Results

Platform live at 14 weeks, £74,000 — under budget.

Bundle preparation time: 18.4 hours2.8 hours per bundle (85% reduction).

Annual fee earner time saving: £1.3M (72% of £1.8M target).

PD 51O compliance: 100% — zero non-compliant bundles submitted.

LPP accidental disclosure: zero (privilege tag enforcement). iManage integration: 240 fee earners active within 4 weeks.

Fee earner satisfaction: 4.7/5 (previous manual process: 1.8/5).

Client Testimonial
18.4 hours to 2.8 hours per bundle. Across 180 ongoing matters, that is transformative capacity. £1.3M fee earner time saving in year one. Zero LPP accidental disclosures — the privilege tag enforcement has prevented what would have been very serious professional incidents. Fee earner satisfaction from 1.8 to 4.7. The firm's highest-rated technology implementation in our history." — Managing Partner, UK Litigation Firm (name withheld)
ClickMasters Case Study Team
Reviewed by James Whitmore, CTO

Project Details

Sector
LegalTech
Country
UK
Status
On Time
Contract
Fixed Price
Tech Stack
7 Technologies
Reading Time
6 min
IP Ownership
100% transferred
Last Updated
September 2025
Written By
ClickMasters Case Study Team
Reviewed By
James Whitmore, CTO

Related Case Studies

View All

Ready to Transform Your Business?

Let's discuss how our technical expertise can help you achieve remarkable results.